雅思大作文寫作范文——征收交通擁擠稅利弊
閱讀 : 次
雅思大作文不僅考查考生的基本英語能力，如單詞量，架構文章的能力，也考查邏輯思維。多數(shù)考生時常不知如何下筆，其中一個原因可能是因為input的內(nèi)容還不夠，沒有寫作思路無從寫起。俗話說近朱者赤，形成思路的最有效的辦法之一是讀好的范文。因此，我們特為大家總結出雅思大作文寫作范文，供大家借鑒。今天給大家介紹一篇——征收交通擁擠稅利弊哪個更大？
下面就請欣賞這篇雅思大作文范文。
題目：
In some countries, the government has tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think this development is positive or negative?
征收交通擁擠稅利弊哪個更大？
范文：
Growing number of cars on the road and congestion is causing problems for the authorities. Some countries have proposed congestion tax to tackle this issue. I think that this can be a positive development. Analysing the factors such as significant reduction in a number of cars, air and noise pollution and clean environment will prove this.
道路上越來越多的汽車和擁堵給當局帶來了問題。一些國家已經(jīng)提議征收交通擁堵稅來解決這個問題。我認為這是一個積極的發(fā)展。分析汽車數(shù)量顯著減少、空氣和噪音污染以及清潔環(huán)境等因素將證明這一點。
Firstly, we see a reduction in a number of cars entering the city after the tax. People look for alternate routes and times to avoid the traffic. For example, entering London during rush hours costs 10￡. This forces people to look for alternate time and routes to enter the city. Similarly, people prefer using buses in Dublin during rush hours over their cars just to avoid the congestion. Hence reducing the traffic load on city road. The actual reduction in cars is thus positive factor for the cities itself.
首先，我們看到在稅收之后進入城市的汽車數(shù)量減少了。人們尋找替代路線和時間來避開交通。例如,進入高峰時期倫敦成本10￡。這迫使人們尋找其他時間和路線進入城市。同樣，在都柏林，人們更喜歡在高峰時間乘坐公交車，而不是開車，只是為了避免交通堵塞。從而降低了城市道路的交通負荷。因此，汽車的實際減少對城市本身是積極因素。
Secondly, less number of cars reduce the overall air and noise pollution. A recent survey in UK and China shows that implementation of tax has significantly reduced the pollution levels. This allows the people to live in a pure environment and thus bringing a positive change.
其次，減少汽車數(shù)量可以減少空氣和噪音污染。最近在英國和中國進行的一項調(diào)查顯示，稅收的實施大大降低了污染水平。這讓人們生活在一個純凈的環(huán)境中，從而帶來積極的變化。
On the contrary, many people may argue that governments should spend money on public transport systems rather than tax but such systems take time and money to develop and might not be the right thing to do at present time.
相反，許多人可能會認為政府應該把錢花在公共交通系統(tǒng)上，而不是稅收，但這種系統(tǒng)需要時間和金錢來發(fā)展，在目前可能不是正確的做法。
In conclusion, the actual reduction in the number of cars and less air and noise pollution are the advantages brought in by congestion tax. I agree that it is a positive development but the need of the hour is to develop better public transport systems by the government.
綜上所述，汽車數(shù)量的實際減少以及空氣和噪音污染的減少是交通擁堵稅帶來的優(yōu)勢。我同意這是一項積極的發(fā)展，但現(xiàn)在需要的是政府發(fā)展更好的公共交通系統(tǒng)。
以上就是為大家推薦的雅思大作文寫作范文，希望能對同學們有幫助。
更多雅思資訊和備考信息，請繼續(xù)關注小站雅思頻道。
更多 雅思作文、雅思寫作、雅思范文、雅思作文范文、雅思高分范文、雅思作文評分標準，
請繼續(xù)關注 英語作文大全
本文地址：http://www.autochemexpert.com/writing/englishtest/ielts/58359.html
