GRE寫作Issue部分精品素材分享之哲學(xué)與政治
想要在GRE作文部分的考試中寫出優(yōu)秀的文章，論據(jù)素材是重要的一環(huán)。好的論據(jù)不僅能幫助你支撐觀點(diǎn)，加強(qiáng)說服力，還能體現(xiàn)出考生在閱讀量上的積累和深厚扎實(shí)的語言功底基礎(chǔ)。特別是ISSUE作文，更是需要大量好素材作為儲(chǔ)備，才能保證考生無論遭遇那種題目，都能游刃有余地完成一篇高分作文的寫作。小編為大家整理了GRE ISSUE作文各類題目的精品優(yōu)質(zhì)素材，一起來看吧。
托夫勒觀點(diǎn)： 權(quán)力
Alvin Toffler’s Powershift argues that the three main kinds of power are violence, wealth, and knowledge with other kinds of power being variations of these three (typically knowledge). Each successive kind of power represents a more flexible kind of power. Violence can only be used negatively, to punish. Wealth can be used both negatively (by withholding money) and positively (by advancing/spending money). Knowledge can be used in these ways but, additionally, can be used in a transformative way. Such examples are, sharing knowledge on agriculture to ensure that everyone is capable of supplying himself and his family of food; allied nations with a shared identity forming with the spread of religious or political philosophies, or one can use knowledge as a tactical/strategic superiority in intelligence (information gathering).
Toffler argues that the very nature of power is currently shifting. Throughout history, power has often shifted from one group to another; however, at this time, the dominant form of power is changing. During the Industrial Revolution, power shifted from a nobility acting primarily through violence to industrialists and financiers acting through wealth. Of course, the nobility used wealth just as the industrial elite used violence, but the dominant form of power shifted from violence to wealth. Today, a Third Wave of shifting power is taking place with wealth being overtaken by knowledge.
哲學(xué)與政治
Philosophers have forever been concerned with political and social matters. Not only have they asked how politics work but mainly, how they should work. These philosophers have been concerned with the nature and justification of political obligation and authority and the goals of political action. Although their doctrines have differentiated, and numerous have been utopian in concept, they have all shared the same ideas and convictions that it is the political philosopher’s duty to distinguish between what is and what ought to be, between existing political institutions and potentially more humane institutions. Throughout the centuries, philosophers have debated over the moral issues involved in the search for the ideal society. Three influential philosophers in this field have been Plato, John Locke and Karl Marx. Their philosophies and utopian states have continually influenced political actions and thoughts throughout the ages.
權(quán)力的概念
Much of the recent sociological debate over power revolves around the issue of the enabling nature of power. A comprehensive account of power can be found in Steven Luke’s Power: A Radical View where he discusses the three dimensions of power. Thus, power can be seen as various forms of constraint on human action, but also as that which makes action possible, although in a limited scope. Much of this debate is related to the works of the French philosopher Michel Foucault (1926-1984), who sees power as “a complex strategic situation in a given society (social setting)”. Being deeply structural, his concept involves both constraint and enablement.
The imposition need not involve coercion (force or threat of force). Thus “power” in the sociological sense subsumes both physical power and political power, including many of the types listed at power. In some ways it more closely resembles what everyday English-speakers call “influence”, although some authors make a sharp distinction between influence as a more general concept, and power as intended influence.
本文地址：http://www.autochemexpert.com/writing/englishtest/gre/49249.html
