手機版

        The Gentle and Tough Taxes on Birth 溫柔、強硬的稅收誕生

        閱讀 :

        The Gentle and Tough Taxes on Birth

        People always have the tendency to regard government pollcies as either gentle or tough. However, there is always exception. Take the taxes on birth for instance. It is really an incredible combination of both.

        Somebody argues that the taxes on birth proclaim to the public what the government wants. That's true. But will the public take birth control without hesitation just because the government wants it? Besides, we can't always count on taxes to reverse people's behavior. The doubled taxes on wine and cigarettes over the past years don't discourage the consumption of them at all, not to mention other luxuries. To a certain degree,drinking and smoking have become more attractive to people as a symbol of financial abilities. How can we expect things to work out better if we simply apply the similar kinds of taxes on birth?

        With the taxes on birth policy, the government seems to suggest to people that it is acceptable to have more children, as long as their families can afford the taxes. Thus new challenges to social equality were posed. Rich people can enjoy larger families while poor people are supposed to have fewer children. The rights of giving more births seemed to be entitled to wealthy people under the taxes policy.

        Besides, once a child is born, he should be guaranteed the very best his parents could offer. In poor families, wouldn't the children, who are taxed be regarded as burdens by other family members because they've imposed more economic pressures on their families? The tax also directly deprives his or her rights to grow up in a better economic condition while such deprivation to a child in a wealthy family doesn't have much influence at all.

        The taxes on birth policy is, after all, gentle to the rich and tough to the poor, especially to the taxed children in poor families. Thus, it is not worth so much recommendation.

        簡 評

        這是一篇給增收人口稅定性的文章。標題所謂的“柔和”是對誰柔和,而“苛刻”又是向誰苛刻,文章在論述時并不是步步緊逼措辭強烈,而是筆調溫和、舒緩。黃雯同學在表述中沒有使用第一人稱,也沒有出現如“in my humble opinion,as for me,I don't

        agree"等字眼,而選擇了people or somebody等作主語,因此筆調措辭顯得柔和。但她態度明確,多處用了反問或否定語氣來強調自己的立場觀點.

        更多 高中英語作文中學生英語作文中學英語作文高中英語寫作教學,請繼續關注 英語作文大全

        本文標題:The Gentle and Tough Taxes on Birth 溫柔、強硬的稅收誕生 - 高中英語作文_高中英語作文范文_中學生英語作文
        本文地址:http://www.autochemexpert.com/writing/gaozhong/93593.html

        相關文章

        你可能感興趣
        主站蜘蛛池模板: 马边| 大邑县| 清流县| 河南省| 平阳县| 都安| 伊川县| 罗平县| 河北区| 吉水县| 望城县| 中西区| 扬州市| 莱州市| 太湖县| 大余县| 安庆市| 临漳县| 鲜城| 松潘县| 隆回县| 临江市| 伊通| 崇阳县| 沛县| 改则县| 忻城县| 徐汇区| 方山县| 九龙县| 集安市| 秦安县| 绥棱县| 绥阳县| 阿坝| 文安县| 盱眙县| 庐江县| 九江市| 和平县| 郴州市|